Yes or No? or...?

To honour something by evaluating, to give it your seal of approval with a human Yes, a human No - this art is practiced by few, and practiced well by fewer. It is the case that most people refuse to publicly evaluate something - either as a result of timidity or inability - and instead of taking the decisive action, the Yes, the No, they dress up their inability as a lofty adherence to philosophical veracity in the form of epistemological skepticism.

It is true that no entity can fully be known, but moving from mere acknowledgement to actual adherence to this school of thought is an essentially nihilistic position to take. If full knowledge of everything that ever was and everything that ever will be were required information for life and for action, how could anything happen? How could humans make any decisions? Here we see rationality in all its insecurity - wanting to do the "right thing", and demanding like an impertinent child to have everything that it wants before it is content - all data, all relations between things, and all possible consequences of a certain decision, all laid out for the insecure and domineering analysis and decision making of the rational mind.

Is life not fuller than rationality? Is the relatively immature, rational part of our brains really the master? Or is the master really the ancient, older, more evolutionarily groomed aspects of our bodies and our brains - our passions, instincts, and desires. Is rationality, and our ability to see, understand, judge, and compare, not the servant of our desires, the spiritual means through which we conquer and order the world in a way no other animal can? And you're willing to deny this? For the sake of a "truth"? Or rather, timidity?